193 192 191 190 189 188 187 186 185 184 183 182 181 180 179 178 177 176 175 174 173 172 171 170 169 168 167 166 165 164 163 162 161 160 159 158 157 156 155 154 153 152 151 150 149 148 147 146 145 144 143 142 141 140 139 138 137 136 135 134 133 132 131 130 129

home
_____________

current issue
_____________
events
_____________

back issues
_____________

subscribe
_____________
submissions
_____________
contact us
_____________
novel search
_____________
poetry prize
_____________

links
_____________


reviews |David Prater

REMEMBERING SHELTON LEA

  • Diana Georgeff: Delinquent Angel (Random House, ISBN 9781741665437, $34.95)

MUCH has been written about this book and its unique subject, the poet Shelton Lea, who passed away in 2005. Lea was well known in Australian poetry and performance circles, particularly in Melbourne where he spent much of his life.
    It was almost impossible when meeting Shelton Lea not to be struck by the force of his personality. While my own reminiscences are scarcely of any interest (especially in a review of a book which for the most parts eschews personal anecdotes), I should point out here that I (like almost every poet in Melbourne over the past few decades) did meet Lea on a number of occasions.
    The interaction I remember most clearly was at a Babble reading, then a weekly event held in the upstairs room at Bar Open in Fitzroy. After reading a poem against the recent invasion of Iraq, which ended with a rhetorical exhortation to get the troops out, I rejoined the crowd, only to find that Lea, in a very frail state, had somehow managed to get onstage and past MC Phil Norton. Lea commandeered the mike and responded to my poem with words to the effect that being against the war was all well and good, as long as I didn’t criticise our troops, who should be above politics.
    My poem hadn’t criticised the troops at all – one got the feeling that Lea intended only to make his own point regardless of the subject matter of my poem. I wondered who the curmudgeonly old man was, and was slightly annoyed at his grandstanding, if not a little peeved that my own ‘message’ had been effectively sideswiped by this cantankerous yet cavalier old gent.
    Only later did I learn his name (most likely over a large trumpet-shaped joint sparked up at the back of the room) and yet it was only after reading Diana Georgeff’s fascinating book that I finally understood the twists and turns of his extraordinary life. While both the Babble spoken word nights and Shelton Lea are now gone, we are left with this shocking biography, whose appeal will surely not be limited to poets. And that’s a good thing.
    What emerges is the peculiar tension provided by Shelton Lea the renegade poet: a man of the street, but also someone raised in an upper class family in Toorak. While the former made him tough and possessed of no small amount of bravado, the latter gave him his love of reading and in particular of poetry, from his obvious association with the Romantics to his engagement with Modernists such as Ezra Pound.
    This tension gives the book its narrative focus and Shelton his humanity. Georgeff has written a tremendously engaging account of one poet’s life, without overly romanticising her subject, and has refrained from writing over Lea’s faults or ignoring his weaknesses.
    The first third describes in brutal detail the circumstances of Shelton Lea’s adoption into the Lea family of chocolate-making fortune, and in particular the fractious relationship between Lea and his adopted mother, Valerie. It evokes a feeling of horror, a sense of impending doom.
    Georgeff describes, almost dispassionately, the systems of control Valerie used in the upbringing of the three adoptees brought into the family as ‘playmates’ for her four natural children. From bizarre systems of punishment, constant surveillance via ‘the Pixies’ (a household intercom) and the sending of Shelton for psychiatric assessment at three years of age, what emerges is a portrait Valerie Lea as a woman possessed of frightening ruthlessness.
    The effects of Valerie’s ‘schooling’ of her brood might well be surmised from the book’s title, and it is interesting to learn that even later in life she did not resile from her extreme methods: Georgeff describes a bitter and tragic ‘reunion’ between Valerie and Shelton later in life.
    Georgeff’s documentation of Shelton’s perhaps inevitable behavioural implosion and eventual incarceration (first in a series of boys’ homes and, later, in prison) is presented as a well-written and engaging narrative, interspersed with selections from Lea’s poetry and his own (somewhat unreliable) remembrances of his time as a delinquent.
    The narrative is not entirely bleak, although episodes such as Shelton’s outraged reaction at being informed by Georgeff that his birth mother had named him Phillip contain a grim humour that underlines the emotional and physical scars Lea bore throughout his life.
    The true extent of Lea’s misfortunes (if such a word is satisfactory) may have been unknown to many of his friends and contemporaries, as the book’s references to acquaintances who had heard only rumours of his adoption into the Lea family demonstrates.
    Indeed, reading this book may well come as a shock to anyone who knew Lea as a well-mannered – if prone to substance abuse – poet. Well, one might say, what’s new? In many ways the Shelton Lea described here fits the cliché of the wild, Romantic poet well and this makes the narrative slightly irritating.
    While Georgeff does remind the reader of Lea’s faults, the assertion that he was a “true poet”, in every sense of the word, rings a little falsely. Perhaps this is because, while there are generous selections of Lea’s poems throughout the book, they are almost always used to back up the narrative flow, and are not analysed, critiqued or appraised.
    Maybe this is being unfair to Georgeff, whose biography at the beginning of the book makes quite plain that she is a journalist, not a poet. Nevertheless, I was disappointed not to find a full list of Lea’s books of poetry, surely something that should have been included to encourage continuing interest in his actual written work.
    While the book also correctly portrays Lea as a charismatic and highly skilled performer, he was, as many who did see him on a bad night would confirm, guilty of moments of self-indulgence. The problem with the evaluation of performance poetry, especially the poetry of Lea and his contemporaries, is that most of their brilliance has now been lost. One simply had to ‘be there’.
    For those of us who were not there, Georgeff does provide some flavour, from Lea’s first encounters with members of the Sydney ‘Push’ to the renegades shouting their verses at the (now defunct) Montsalvat poetry festivals. Georgeff also largely avoids the temptation to include ‘tributes’ to Lea from all and sundry – a decision I personally applaud, as much for its pragmatism (how many poets to interview?) as for its dogmatic concentration on the facts of the long narrative of Shelton’s life.
    For this reason I believe that Delinquent Angel will be appealing and riveting reading for anyone interested in poetry (especially the Romantic or ‘gutter’ variety), the vexed subject of adoption in the 1950s and more recently, and the (largely unwritten) histories of street culture in Melbourne in particular.
    Nevertheless I finished this book with one nagging question: just who is Diana Georgeff? Throughout the book we receive snippets of information about her own connections to the Lea family (she was a schoolmate of Shelton’s adopted sister, Honey); she also undertakes the task of finding Lea’s birth mother (who had in fact passed away years before her identity was revealed to Shelton); and she seems to spend much time being carted around by Shelton who invariably introduces her grandly as “my biographer”.
    While Georgeff appears to rail against this description (and who wouldn’t? Shelton never introduces her by name), I can’t help but wonder if there is more to this aspect of the story. Doubtless a certain distance is essential in any professional relationship, but I was left craving more of Georgeff’s own feelings.
    What led her to write this biography, and whose idea was it in the first place? Was it her status as a family friend of sorts that allowed her access to Valerie Lea’s astonishing diaries? Or was it precisely the fact that Georgeff is not a poet that led to her being chosen as the chronicler of Lea’s life and times? Perhaps we shall never know. And maybe that’s a good thing too.


David Prater is a poet and editor of Cordite Poetry Review.  

© David Prater

Overland 190–autumn 2008, p.82–83

Click here to order issue

190

190 contents

editorial

poetry prize results

feature | MARK DAVIS

feature | EMMY HENNINGS

feature | JENNY LEE

feature | TOM CLARK

feature |CLIVE HAMILTON

feature | JENNIFER MILLS

feature | ANDREW MOORE

memoir | DAVID CARLIN

feature | BEN KIERNAN & TAYLOR OWEN

feature | ALASTAIR DAVIDSON

fiction | JESSICA AU

fiction | RICHARD LAWSON

fiction | PEIRZ NEWTON-JOHN

poetry | ANTIGONE KEFALA

poetry | MICHAEL FARRELL

poetry | LOUIS ARMAND

poetry | KRISTEL THORNELL

poetry | DANNY GENTILE

poetry | DAVID LUMSDEN

poetry | MIKE HEALD

poetry | LEHMANN SMITH

poetry | TOM LEE

poetry | TIM WRIGHT

review | DAVID PRATER

review |REBECCA STARFORD

review | MICHELE LEE

review |ROLF HEIMANN

review | CAM WALKER

review | BERNARD WHIMPRESS

review | MARK PENDLETON AND ELENA JEFFREYS

SUBSCRIBE HERE

ORDER HERE

ozco logo